|
(詳細はUnited Nations Secretary-General (UNSG) Ban Ki-moon to advise him on the issue of accountability with regard to any alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War.〔(Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka )〕 The report is referred to by some as the Darusman Report, after the name of the chairman of the panel (Indonesian politician Marzuki Darusman). The panel's work revealed "a very different version of the final stages of the war than that maintained to this day by the Government of Sri Lanka". The panel found "credible allegations" which, if proven, indicated that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed by the Sri Lankan military and the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Tamil Tigers).〔〔〔 The panel concluded that "the conduct of the war represented a grave assault on the entire regime of international law designed to protect individual dignity during both war and peace". The panel found that as many as 40,000 civilians may have been killed in the final months of the civil war, most as a result of indiscriminate shelling by the Sri Lankan military. The panel has called on the UNSG to conduct an independent international investigation into the alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law committed by both sides. The Sri Lankan government has rejected the entire report, calling it "fundamentally flawed in many respects", and as being based on "patently biased" and unverified material.〔〔(Government media center citation on MINISTER OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS )〕 A competing report was produced by Sri Lanka's Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). In 2012, the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) issued a statement welcoming the publication of this report (while acknowledging problems therein) and urging the Sri Lankan government to follow up by working with the UNHRC.〔("Human Rights Council 19th Session United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Introduction of Annual Report 2011" ), "United Nations Human Rights", 2 March, 2012〕 The LLRC report has been praised in Sri Lanka,〔("LLRC scores over Darusman" ), ''Sri Lanka News'', 16 March 2012.〕 but criticised by opponents of the island's government.〔("UN Human Rights Council passes resolution on Sri Lanka" ), ''World Socialist Web Site'', 28 March 2012.〕 ==Background== The final months of the Sri Lankan Civil War resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians, the displacement of more than 350,000, and allegations of gross violations of international and humanitarian law by both sides. Foreign governments, international human groups and Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora groups all called for an independent investigation. Immediately following the end of the civil war in May 2009, UNSG Ban Ki-moon visited Sri Lanka. At end of the trip the UNSG and Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa issued a joint statement in which the Sri Lankan government agreed to take measures on accountability for violations of international humanitarian and human rights law.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.reliefweb.int/node/310710/pdf )〕 In the following months the Sri Lankan government failed to take any meaningful steps on accountability and more evidence emerged of alleged violations during the final months of the civil war. As pressure grew for an international inquiry the UNSG appointed a three-member panel of experts in June 2010 to advise him on accountability issues relating to alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law in the final stages of the civil war. The panel looked into "accountability with regard to any alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law" and whether the commitment on "human rights accountability" given by Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa to Ban Ki-moon has been implemented. The panel examined "the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative experience with regard to accountability processes, taking into account the nature and scope of any alleged violations in Sri Lanka". The Sri Lankan government reacted angrily to the panel's appointment, calling it "an unwarranted and unnecessary interference with a sovereign nation".〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.slmfa.gov.lk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2439&Itemid=75 )〕 It stated that the panel would not be allowed to enter Sri Lanka, a move criticised by Darusman. The panel's appointment was welcomed by the United States and EU but criticised by Russia and China.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/143560.htm )〕〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/en/article_9897_en.htm )〕 The panel met for the first time on 19 July 2010. On 12 April 2011 the panel handed over its report to the Secretary-General who passed on a copy to the Sri Lankan government. The Sri Lankan government immediately rejected the report as "fundamentally flawed" and "patently biased". The report wasn't initially made public but the UN said it would be made public in due course. Human rights called on the UN to make the report public.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/un-report-sri-lanka-conflict-must-be-made-public-2011-04-12 )〕〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/04/12/sri-lanka-un-experts-submit-report )〕 On 16 April 2011 the report was published in ''The Island'', an independently owned nationalist Sri Lankan newspaper. It had been suggested that the Sri Lankan government leaked the report so that it could issue a full rebuttal before of the report is officially made public by the UN.〔 The Sri Lankan government did not make a formal reply and on 25 April 2011 the UN published the full report. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|